The other day I read an article on Esperanto. This first part of four dealt mainly with the idea that Esperanto is a suitable means of worldwide communication due to its ability to express even complex and litarary contents and the fact that it is easy to learn.
This made me think about English, which is considered "the" world language. I teach English, I converse in English with most of my international friends and I love this language. Of course, English is also a rich language, one that can express a lot of thoughts, emotions and facts (like all languages that are spoken by thinking human beings). I realized that "English" (like all languages) has so many facets. For me it is not the language of the US political, economic and military leaders, for me it is first of all the language of literature that I love very much. The language of Shakespeare, Jane Austen, Mark Twain, Paul Auster. The language of books like "To Killl a Mockingbird", or the language of Oscar Wilde's "The Importance of Being Earnest." The language that created immortal lines in "Romeo and Juliet" or "Hamlet".
English got this image of "world language" not because it is spoken by so many people. If that was the criterion, we would all be learning Chinese or Spanish. It is true that English grammar is easier to memorize than French or Spanish verb forms, but the details of expressing things can be just as complicated and delicate. English is a flexible language, one that has absorbed words from a lot of languages, and it is a language that is used and adapted to individual needs in its local varieties.
But the main reason why English is considered a "world language" is one of power, history and politics. The British Empire also spread its language (made easy by the facts I mentioned above) and today the USA are the remaining superpower... American politics, economy and culture rule and so does the language.
And when I got to this point, I thought that a "world language" that has nothing to do with power and oppression, but was created as a means of peace could maybe really help us. I should find out more about Esperanto ...
The article mentioned at the beginning is:
Guillermo Macías y Díaz Infante: Pasado, presente y futuro del Esperanto (Primera de cuatro partes), in: La Jornada Aguascalientes, 2nd September, 2010, p. 6 (written in Spanish and Esperanto)
You may be interested in the seven-point Prague Manifesto, an up-to-date rationale for the non-ethnic inter-language Esperanto:
ReplyDeletehttp://lingvo.org
Thanks for pointing out a great article on Esperanto! If you're looking for more information, consider the following:
ReplyDelete* Esperanto.net is a good source of general information on Esperanto and places you can go to find Esperanto speakers, including in Germany (select de:Deutsch on the opening page for Germany-specific information).
* Lernu.net contains several free self-study courses of varying levels, an online dictionary and a grammar. Among the beginning-level courses, Ana Pana comes highly recommended; a good intermediate-level course is Gerda Malaperis.
* Kurso de Esperanto is a freely downloadable introductory-level multimedia course.
Good luck learning Esperanto (actually, luck has very little to do with it :-) )
Multan dankon (got that from a dictionary) for your interest and comments !
ReplyDelete